Optical space telescope
Nothing listed for this instrument.
Habitable Worlds ObservatoryReflected light
Illustration of future S9. Earth looks almost untouched, like a world before farming, and the scenario study lists no changes to its surface. A few crystalline gifts stand quietly in the landscape and sparse machine nodes circle high above. The machine civilization’s works are elsewhere: on Mars, Venus and around the Sun. The description and data are on this page.
- Population in 1,000 years
- 200 trillion≈ 25 thousand × the study’s Earth population
- Energy used per year
- 10 million EJ a year≈ 17 thousand × the study’s Earth energy use1 × 10²⁵ joules a year
- Trend
- Growing
- Growth rate
- 0.98% a year
What is “the study’s Earth”?
The scenario study measures every future against a fixed Earth: 7.9 billion people, each using 75 gigajoules of energy a year (592.5 EJ per year in total). An exajoule (EJ) is a billion billion joules.
The multipliers are rounded and count every world a civilization lives on. The reference is the study’s model, not a measurement of Earth today, and says nothing about how many people a planet can support.
Planetary technosignatures: industrial pollution scaling, p. 12 ↗Table 9 caption and Section 5.1, p. 18 ↗
What this future is like.
How the scenario study describes this civilization. Where it offers more than one option, both are shown. Each line links to the table it came from.
| Economy | Non-scarcityTable 2, p. 5 ↗ |
|---|---|
| Politics | Rule by allTable 2, p. 5 ↗ |
| Society | DistributedTable 2, p. 5 ↗ |
| Technology and nature | They are completely separateIn the paper: The biosphere and technosphere have no common elementsTable 4, p. 7 ↗ |
| Centers of technology | No centerIn the paper: Non-polarTable 4, p. 7 ↗ |
| How technology develops | Designed and directedTable 4, p. 7 ↗ |
| Smallest engineering scale | Less than 1 nm or 1 nm to 1 μmTable 4, p. 7 ↗ |
What a telescope could see.
Five instruments, from the observing study. “Nothing listed” means the study lists no sign for that instrument—not that this civilization has no technology.
Reflected light
Radio telescope array
Nothing listed for this instrument.
Radio arrayRadio signals
Infrared telescope array
Nothing listed for this instrument.
Large Interferometer for ExoplanetsThermal glow
Sun-as-a-lens telescope
- large surface features (Venus, Mars)
Resolved surface imaging
Visiting space probe
- large surface features (Venus, Mars)
Close-up exploration
Marks on each world.
Pollution, night lights, reshaped land, satellites and haze on Earth, the Moon, Mars and Venus, compared with Earth today. Each kind of mark keeps its own units; we don’t squash them onto one scale.
| World | Mark | Amount | Measured as | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earth | Industrial pollution | Not given | abundance relative to Earth 2024 | Table 6, p. 14 ↗ |
| Moon | Industrial pollution | Not given | abundance relative to Earth 2024 | Table 6, p. 14 ↗ |
| Mars | Industrial pollutionS5 and S6 include artificial greenhouse gases for terraforming Mars. | Not given | abundance relative to Earth 2024 | Table 6, p. 14 ↗ |
| Venus | Industrial pollutionS5 and S6 indicate O2 production and depletion of other constituents for terraforming Venus. | Not given | abundance relative to Earth 2024 | Table 6, p. 14 ↗ |
| Earth | Agricultural pollution | Not given | abundance relative to Earth 2024 | Table 6, p. 14 ↗ |
| Moon | Agricultural pollution | Not given | abundance relative to Earth 2024 | Table 6, p. 14 ↗ |
| Mars | Agricultural pollution | Not given | abundance relative to Earth 2024 | Table 6, p. 14 ↗ |
| Venus | Agricultural pollution | Not given | abundance relative to Earth 2024 | Table 6, p. 14 ↗ |
| Earth | Artificial illumination | Not given | intensity relative to Earth 2024 | Table 6, p. 14 ↗ |
| Moon | Artificial illumination | Not given | intensity relative to Earth 2024 | Table 6, p. 14 ↗ |
| Mars | Artificial illumination | Not given | intensity relative to Earth 2024 | Table 6, p. 14 ↗ |
| Venus | Artificial illumination | Not given | intensity relative to Earth 2024 | Table 6, p. 14 ↗ |
| Earth | Surface modification | Not given | fraction of planetary surface | Table 6, p. 14 ↗ |
| Moon | Surface modification | Not given | fraction of planetary surface | Table 6, p. 14 ↗ |
| Mars | Surface modification | 1 | fraction of planetary surface | Table 6, p. 14 ↗ |
| Venus | Surface modification | 1 | fraction of planetary surface | Table 6, p. 14 ↗ |
| Earth | Satellite belt | 50 | density relative to Earth 2024 | Table 6, p. 14 ↗ |
| Moon | Satellite belt | 5 | density relative to Earth 2024 | Table 6, p. 14 ↗ |
| Mars | Satellite belt | 10 | density relative to Earth 2024 | Table 6, p. 14 ↗ |
| Venus | Satellite belt | 10 | density relative to Earth 2024 | Table 6, p. 14 ↗ |
| Earth | Contaminated aerosol | Not given | density relative to Earth 2024 | Table 6, p. 14 ↗ |
| Moon | Contaminated aerosol | Not given | density relative to Earth 2024 | Table 6, p. 14 ↗ |
| Mars | Contaminated aerosol | Not given | density relative to Earth 2024 | Table 6, p. 14 ↗ |
| Venus | Contaminated aerosol | Not given | density relative to Earth 2024 | Table 6, p. 14 ↗ |
Beyond Earth, and over time.
Signs of technology across the Solar System come from the scenario study. Collapse and recovery come from a separate study that simulates each future for 1,000 years.
Signs beyond Earth
- Radio leakage
- Optical communication
- Planetary defense radar
- Asteroid mining
- Fusion propulsion
- Outer planet settlements
- Kuiper belt mining
- Quantum communication
- Laser propulsion
- Gravitational waves
- Dyson sphere
Collapse and recovery
Collapses later than the other collapse-prone scenarios, with multiple interruptions but high continuity.
- Time spent active
- 91% on average
- Collapses
- About 1.5 on average
- How precise
- Approximate, from the paper’s text
The air on this Earth.
The gases and temperature the observing study gives this future’s Earth. Where the paper leaves a value out, we show “Not given” rather than zero.
Show the atmosphere table
| Gas or property | Value | Unit | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean Temperature | 288 | K | Table 1, p. 4 ↗ |
| CO2 | 280 | ppm | Table 1, p. 4 ↗ |
| CH4 | 0.57 | ppm | Table 1, p. 4 ↗ |
| NOx | 0.1 | ppb | Table 1, p. 4 ↗ |
| N2O | 170 | ppb | Table 1, p. 4 ↗ |
| NH3 | 2 | ppb | Table 1, p. 4 ↗ |
| CFC-11 | Not given | ppb | Table 1, p. 4 ↗ |
| CFC-12 | Not given | ppb | Table 1, p. 4 ↗ |
| NF3 | Not given | ppt | Table 1, p. 4 ↗ |
| SF6 | 0.01 | ppt | Table 1, p. 4 ↗ |
| CF4 | 35 | ppt | Table 1, p. 4 ↗ |
| SO2, Stratospheric | Not given | ppb | Table 1, p. 4 ↗ |
| Na Emission | Not given | erg s^-1 cm^-2 | Table 1, p. 4 ↗ |
| Laser Emission, 1.064 um | Not given | MW | Table 1, p. 4 ↗ |
Objects from this world.
Stories and objects artists made inside this future. They’re fiction, not evidence. Works whose creators reserve all rights are linked, never copied here.
The Root of Ga-IA
Bera B.
CC BY 4.0View the original ↗